...did you read it? He's theorising on the possible reasons for the gender representation gap on average using biological data as evidence. Just saying he's dumb over and over doesn't do anything, and it frankly confuses me a fair bit. I don't think most people on his side are 'outraged' because they agree, disagree with him if you like (I'd advise to challenge his evidence and numbers instead of calling him 'dumb' and coming off as a five year old). I think it has a hell of a lot to do with the ridiculous overreaction to a think-piece, and the depressing nature of modern-day debate. At least it's depressing to me.